Even a Limited Nuclear War Could Kill 1/3 of Earth's Population

 This is quite a headline to see on Yahoo News this morning.  We all know that using nukes would have cataclysmic consequences but to see the discussion carried out on Yahoo is pretty surreal.

As escalating tensions among the United States, Russia and China revive old fears of nuclear war, some researchers are warning that even a limited-scale exchange between such nations as India and Pakistan could have catastrophic consequences for global food supplies and trigger mass death worldwide.

A nuclear conflict involving less than 3% of the world’s stockpiles could kill a third of the world’s population within two years, according to a new international study led by scientists at Rutgers University. A larger nuclear conflict between Russia and the United States could kill three-fourths of the world’s population in the same timeframe, according to the research published Monday in Nature Food.

“It’s really a cautionary tale that any use of nuclear weapons could be a catastrophe for the world,” said climate scientist and study author Alan Robock, a distinguished professor in Rutgers' Department of Environmental Sciences.

The findings come at a time when — 30 years after the end of the Cold War — the threat of a nuclear holocaust may be greater now than it ever was.

Recently, U.K. National Security Advisor Stephen Lovegrove argued that the breakdown in dialogue between nations, as well as the loss of safeguards that had been created between nuclear superpowers decades ago, has plunged the world into "a dangerous new age." United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has also warned that "the prospect of nuclear conflict, once unthinkable, is now back within the realm of possibility."

Although Robock and others have previously projected that nuclear war would result in tremendous disruption to the climate and food supplies, the recent study marks the first time that researchers have calculated the potential extent of the famine that would result and how many people would die.

The detonation of even just a small fraction of the world’s nuclear weapons would spark massive firestorms that would rapidly inject sun-blocking soot into the atmosphere, touching off a sudden cooling of the climate, the researchers theorized.

Researchers used climate models to calculate how much smoke would reach the stratosphere — where no precipitation occurs to wash it away — and how this would change temperature, precipitation and sunlight. Then they calculated how these changes would affect the production of various crops, as well as how fish would respond to changes in the ocean.

As a result, they projected that tens of millions of immediate fatalities in the war zone would be followed by hundreds of millions of starvation deaths around the globe.

Here;  Even a limited nuclear war could kill a third of world's population, study shows (yahoo.com)

We continue to hold onto the Word of God that says in the Last Days people will be "eating, drinking, marrying, giving in marriage, planting and building."  All of those activities are done as long as folks believe we have a future and that things are going to stay "pretty much as they always have been".

Of course if there were a nuclear exchange that happened before the rapture and billions of people were starving to death this doesn't seen like a "pretty much normal" scenario.

For this reason we believe an event like this could certainly happen during the Great Tribulation but we will have already been taken "to the place He has prepared for us" before such a calamity would play out.

That IS our blessed hope.