How Many Judges Does it Take to Define a Woman?

 More news from clown world today.  Since 50% of the country can no longer define what a woman is, the  absurdity continues to dip to new lows.  Read on to learn how a 260 man was forced into a sorority by woke college girls who have been indoctrinated by elite professors and most liberal Democrats.  Where does it end?  With the collapse of a once great society because they can’t even speak the same language.

*********************

Today's most pressing women's rights issue is not abortion. It's not equal pay, domestic violence, or child care. It's whether society is willing to recognize "women" at all. Without this basic understanding, there can be no "women's" interest demanding or deserving of protection.

That's why Independent Women's Law Center is representing six Kappa Kappa Gamma sisters at the University of Wyoming in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. The lawsuit alleges that Kappa's national leadership ran roughshod over the sorority's bylaws to provide membership to a biological male: a 260-pound, 21-year-old individual with a 1.9 GPA (well below the sorority's 2.7 cutoff) who discussed his "desire to be near cadavers and to touch dead bodies" during the recruitment process. The sisters say they were forced to vote publicly and informed that a "no" vote would be a sign of bigotry and a basis for expulsion. Since joining, the male member has taken unwanted pictures of the women, asked them to describe their vaginas, and watched the girls undress.

Time and again we see injustices like what happened to these sorority sisters egged on by elitists who congratulate themselves for such devout commitment to diversity and inclusion, having already reaped the benefits of single-sex living years ago. But despite their professed commitment to inclusion, by pretending that "women" includes biological males, they in fact deprive women the say they are owed. That sounds pretty exclusionary to me.

Sadly, the district court ruled in favor of Kappa leadership. In the process, it stripped the organization's bylaws of any meaning. "Woman," the court said, is "undefined," and cannot be constrained by the "circumscribed definition Plaintiffs urge." "Woman" might mean anyone who claims to be a woman, at least according to a federal court.

Of course, this is nonsensical from a basic definitional perspective. Identifying oneself as a "woman" still requires an underlying definition of "woman." Self-identification can never provide a definition since it has no boundaries on its own. Even an inanimate object like my iPhone can "identify" as a woman, but it's still an iPhone.

https://www.newsweek.com/how-many-judges-does-it-take-define-woman-opinion-1845756