Pakistan Leader Threatens Nuclear Jihad

India and Pakistan have fought three wars since 1947, none of them were fought when they both had nuclear weapons.  Today, that's not true.  They are at war over the Kashmir.  India's leader just appeared at a massive rally in America that sold out 50,000 tickets and featured him standing together with President Trump.  This has probably rattled the Muslim leader of Pakistan and prompted him to use the word JIHAD when he spoke at the United Nations this week.

Pakistan and India have fought three wars since the 1947 partition created the two states; two of the three were over Kashmir. None of those wars occurred when either country possessed nuclear weapons. 

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan addressed the United Nations on Sept. 29 and threatened to change that. Mr. Khan took the 15 minutes of speaking time allotted him and went nearly an hour, using the entire speech to speak of “jihad” over Kashmir and rail against his Indian counterpart, Prime Minister Nehendra Modi. 

“Jihad” is not a word the world wants to hear from a man atop a self-described Islamic republic that owns more than 100 nuclear weapons. 

Mr. Modi is on a strong run. He was re-elected this past spring in a landslide. He has made significant changes regarding Kashmir’s status under the Indian constitution, changes which the Western media mostly misread or label “annexation.” He also addressed the United Nations the same morning as Mr. Khan, and spoke on Kashmir as well. Prior to the U.N. address, Mr. Modi visited Houston, Texas.

Mr. Modi attended the largest ever rally for a foreign leader on American soil. Fifty thousand tickets for the event, at the massive NRG Stadium, sold out quickly. Indian-Americans traveled to the “Howdy, Modi!” event from as far away as both coasts.

From an American point of view, India may be, at the very least, the least bad option for Kashmir. Pakistan is unreliable and harbors the worst of the worst terrorists. It persecutes Christians. It is unstable and prone to internal violence. Mr. Khan himself works closely with Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, long a thorn in America’s side. Together, they and Malaysia are collaborating on a global news network patterned after the BBC but which will, in their own words, “counter Islamophobia.” Mr. Khan et al may want to consider the obvious: The best way to counter Islamophobia is to stop threatening jihad and running terrorist ratlines into contested territory — especially when you hold an arsenal of nuclear weapons. 

Here;  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/3/prime-minister-khan-threatens-nuclear-jihad-over-k/

We can certainly file this news under the WARS AND RUMORS OF WAR file.

It also makes us wonder why the Left seems so terrified about the world ending in 12 years due to man-made climate change, but seems willing to give a pass to Islamic talk about jihad from a leader of a very sketchy nation that has 100 nukes?

It's one of those things that makes you say, 'Hmmmmmmm......??"

Of course if little Greta Thunburg had stood in front the United Nations and lectured the leaders there about the apocalyptic warnings coming from Muslim leaders, she would have been escorted off stage and quickly silenced.  You can't criticize Islam and expect to keep your card-carrying-membership of the Left.