Thursday, July 17, 2014

Is Incest Really So Bad?

What if you loved your sister SO MUCH that you just couldn't imagine life without her in your bed?

Does that sound sick?

Wait just a minute!!  Who are you to judge what two adults want to do!  And if their lovemaking produces a child with birth can always just abort it before it is born.

Remember, that sister and brother didn't ask to be attracted to each other...they were BORN THAT please embrace incest so those who practice it won't feel so bad.  They are tired of being looked down upon by society.

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and "unnatural" but is now widely accepted.
He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

"A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now 'available', not having [a] sexual partner," the judge said.

"If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you'd invariably have, they would say it's unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone."

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

"By that stage they are both mature adults," the judge said.

"The complainant has been sexually awoken, shall we say, by having two relationships with men and she had become 'free' when the second relationship broke down. The only thing that might change that is the fact that they were a brother and sister but we've come a long way from the 1950s – when the position of the English Common Law was that sex outside marriage was not lawful."


Friends, once a society detaches from how the Bible tells us to live...there is NOTHING that can be called good or bad.  Everything becomes relative and everything is up to the individual to decide what is good and bad.

To some men, having sex with their mother sounds awful...but to other men, it sounds pretty good.  And soon we will have the courts agreeing with that stance.  Why not?  As long as they are both consenting to it...what can it possibly hurt?

"In that day, Israel had no king.  Every man did as he saw fit."

Sadly, that is exactly where civilized society is heading once again.

Hat tip to Christine P.

Monday, July 14, 2014

Hamas Fires Missiles at Nuclear Reactor

How stupid do you have to be to shoot missiles at a nuclear reactor?  Well it turns out you have to be pretty stupid....which is exactly what the ignorant folks at Hamas just confirmed.

After the horrors of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, how insane do you have to be to fire missiles directly at a major nuclear facility?  No matter what side you are on in the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, everyone should be able to agree that it is utter madness for Hamas to fire rockets at the Dimona nuclear installation in the Negev.  The intent, of course, was to destroy the Dimona facility and create a horrific nuclear disaster in the heart of Israel.  Fortunately, the area is heavily protected by the Iron Dome missile defense system and none of the rockets did any damage.  And it is questionable how much damage to the facility that Hamas missiles could actually do.  But that is not the point.  What matters is that Hamas is trying to do it.  With each passing year, Hamas rockets are becoming more advanced, more accurate and more powerful.  And when Hamas fires some of their best rockets at a major nuclear facility, they are committing an act of all-out war.  If Hamas continues to do this, it could spark a major regional war in which countless numbers of people could die.  Is that what they want?

There has been a lot of criticism of Israel in the mainstream media in recent days, but much of it is quite hypocritical.  Just imagine what would happen in the U.S. if another country fired just one missile at New York City or at one of our nuclear reactors.  If that happened, "glass parking lot" would suddenly be on the lips of tens of millions of Americans all over the country, and the U.S. military would rapidly be preparing for an absolutely devastating response.

But where Hamas has really stepped over the line is by firing at the Dimona nuclear facility.  The fact that Hamas is attempting to create a nuclear holocaust is essentially an act of genocide.  The following is how the Jerusalem Post described the attack...

Three rockets were launched at Dimona in southern Israel on Wednesday afternoon. The Iron Dome intercepted one rocket before it could land, while two other rockets landed in open areas.

Dimona is the location of Israel's nuclear reactor. There was no indication that rockets damaged any part of the reactor.

Hamas claimed responsibility for the rockets, stating that it had been attempting to hit the nuclear reactor.

Militants from Hamas's Qassam Brigades said they had launched long-range M-75 rockets towards Dimona.

And as Breitbart has pointed out, what Hamas has just done is actually an act of nuclear terrorism as defined by the United Nations...

Article 2 (1) of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism states:

1. Any person commits an offence within the meaning of this Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally...(b)...uses or damages a nuclear facility in a manner which releases or risks the release of radioactive material: (i) With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or (ii) With the intent to cause substantial damage to property or to the environment; or (iii) With the intent to compel a natural or legal person, an international organization or a State to do or refrain from doing an act.

Let us hope that future Hamas missile strikes will not do any damage to Dimona either.


What will it take for Israel to stop the missiles coming out of Gaza?  What happens if Hezbollah in Lebanon starts shooting hundreds of missiles?  What happen if ISIS in Syria starts shooting hundreds of missiles into Israel?  What sure seems like this whole situation could be spelling out what Psalm 83 described 2500 years ago.

O God, do not remain silent;
    do not turn a deaf ear,
    do not stand aloof, O God.
2 See how your enemies growl,
    how your foes rear their heads.
3 With cunning they conspire against your people;
    they plot against those you cherish.
4 “Come,” they say, “let us destroy them as a nation,
    so that Israel’s name is remembered no more.”
5 With one mind they plot together;
    they form an alliance against you—
6 the tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites,
    of Moab and the Hagrites,
7 Byblos, Ammon and Amalek,
    Philistia, with the people of Tyre.
8 Even Assyria has joined them
    to reinforce Lot’s descendants.

Philisia is Gaza, Tyre is in Lebanon, the tent of Edom could be the tents of the Palestinian refugees in Jordan, Edom is Jordan, Hagrites were in the land along Egypt's border, Moab is in Jordan, Ammon is the capital of Jordan, Ishmaelites are Arabs that lived in what is now Saudi Arabia, and Assyria is the land that is now Syria and parts of Iraq.

No doubt that group of folks continues to hate Jews and Israel with a Satanic passion.  They ARE saying right now, "Come, let us destroy them as a nation."

So let's be clear...we have NO IDEA if today's events playing out in Israel have ANYTHING TO DO with what Psalm 83 describes...BUT....when you look at the details of the players mentioned, it's one of those things that makes you say, "Hmmmmm....."

Obama Most Popular With Muslims and Atheists

I always suspected this might be the case...and now Gallup confirms it.

Gallup: Majorities of Muslims and Atheists Approve of Obama; Christians Don't

( – While President Barack Obama’s job approval rating was highest, by religion, among Muslims, other non-Christians, Jews (by faith), and atheists, his highest job disapproval ratings were among Christians -- Catholics, Protestants, Mormons, and other Christians.

In the survey, conducted January-June 2014, Gallup asked about Obama’s job approval and disapproval, by religion.  While 72% of Muslims and 54% of atheists expressed approval, only 44% of Catholics did, and only 37% of Protestant/Other Christian and 18% of Mormon/Latter-day Saints.

As for those Americans who disapprove of Obama’s job performance, 51% are Catholic; 58% are Protestant/Other Christian; and 78% are Mormon/Latter-day Saints.

“The United States remains a predominantly Christian nation, with roughly half of Americans identifying with a Protestant religion and another quarter identifying as Catholics,” said Gallup. “Thus, the opinions of these Christian groups are by far the most influential in determining Obama's overall ratings.”

“The patterns in Obama's job approval by religion have prevailed throughout his presidency, with Muslim, Jewish, and nonreligious Americans giving him higher ratings, and Mormons and Protestants giving him the lowest ratings,” said Gallup. “Catholics have typically been closest to the national average, but slightly above it.”


As I read this I am thinking again about the words of Jesus, "A kingdom divided against itself will not stand."  It makes me wonder how long America can have a broken Congress, a lawless President and a court system that over-rules the votes of the people?

One thing is for certain...Obama came into the White House with the most good will since probably John F Kennedy...and he has totally squandered that good will and has now become a President with one of the lowest job approval ratings EVER!