China Says Minor Incident With USA Could Spark War

Being the world's only Super Power is a tough role to play.  Everyone looks at you for leadership and lots of folks think you should be able to solve all the problems that exist between nations and people groups from here to Zimbabwe!

Japan and Taiwan have been our allies since the end of WWII.  China has been a frosty relationship for a variety of reasons, the biggest one being Communism and the RED SCARE that truly terrified us for about 30+ years.  So how are we going to referee the growing conflict between China and Japan?  Is USA really going to be willing to go to war with China if shooting breaks out between China and Japan?

China has recently gone into the South China Sea and started making islands or adding onto existing rocks that jut out of the ocean.  Then as soon as they have enough land created to put a flag on it they claim the "territory" for Mother China and also claim the sea territory for up to 200 miles around the little rock island.

So if we let them get away with that we are allowing a very dangerous precedent!  But if we continue sailing our naval ships in the seas near the islands that China now claims, we risk having a confrontation and/or shooting war with China.

China's naval commander told his U.S. counterpart that a minor incident could spark war in the South China Sea if the United States did not stop its "provocative acts" in the disputed waterway, the Chinese navy said on Friday.

Admiral Wu Shengli made the comments to U.S. chief of naval operations Admiral John Richardson during a video teleconference on Thursday, according to a Chinese naval statement.

The two officers held talks after a U.S. warship sailed within 12 nautical miles of one of Beijing's man-made islands in the contested Spratly archipelago on Tuesday.

China has rebuked Washington over the patrol, the most significant U.S. challenge yet to territorial limits China effectively claims around its seven artificial islands in one of the world's busiest sea lanes.

"If the United States continues with these kinds of dangerous, provocative acts, there could well be a seriously pressing situation between frontline forces from both sides on the sea and in the air, or even a minor incident that sparks war," the statement paraphrased Wu as saying.

"(I) hope the U.S. side cherishes the good situation between the Chinese and U.S. navies that has not come easily and avoids these kinds of incidents from happening again," Wu said.

Speaking earlier, a U.S. official said the naval chiefs agreed to maintain dialogue and follow protocols to avoid clashes.

Scheduled port visits by U.S. and Chinese ships and planned visits to China by senior U.S. Navy officers remained on track, the official said.

"None of that is in jeopardy. Nothing has been canceled," said the official.

UNPLANNED ENCOUNTERS

Both officers agreed on the need to stick to protocols established under the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES).

"They agreed that it's very important that both sides continue to use the protocols under the CUES agreement when they're operating close to keep the chances for misunderstanding and any kind of provocation from occurring," the U.S. official said.

Indeed, Wu said he believed the Chinese and U.S. navies had plenty of scope for cooperation and should both "play a positive role in maintaining peace and stability in the South China Sea".

A U.S. Navy spokesman stressed Washington's position that U.S. freedom of navigation operations were meant to "protect the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea and airspace guaranteed to all nations under international law".

Chinese warships followed the USS Lassen, a guided-missile destroyer, as it moved through the Spratlys on Tuesday. The U.S. Navy is operating in a maritime domain bristling with Chinese ships.

While the U.S. Navy is expected to keep its technological edge in Asia for decades, China's potential trump card is sheer weight of numbers, with dozens of naval and coastguard vessels routinely deployed in the South China Sea, security experts say.

Here;  http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/30/us-southchinasea-usa-china-navy-idUSKCN0SO05320151030

So are we afraid of China or is China afraid of us?

There can be no doubt that America has a HUGE military advantage over China, BUT...is America really willing to use it?  Have you noticed how the term, "boots on the ground" has been picked up by the media and used in questions to figure out whether America is getting involved in foreign places?

"So Secretary Carter, are you saying that America is now willing to put boots on the ground in Syria?"

Never mind that we have Air Force planes dropping bombs in Syria every day...that's not really considered "war" according to most of the media and many liberals.  In their minds it's only war if we put 'boots on the ground' and start having our boys get shot at and come home in body bags.

WWII lost us hundreds of thousands of soldiers.  Korea lost us thousands more.  Viet Nam lost us thousands more.  Iraq and Afghanistan cost us a few thousand and clearly that was too many for America and we surrendered our hard won gains in Iraq and now it appears to be falling to radical Muslims.

Do we really have the stomach for war anymore?

We could have the strongest military in the world but if we don't want to fight or we are scared to fight or if we are too bankrupt to fight....then lesser nations with lesser military capabilities will just walk in and take what they want.

For now America seems content to keep operating around the Chinese navy exerting their power and influence....but what if China gets sick of it and sinks one of our boats and kills dozens of sailors? Are we really willing to take on China over some rocks in the sea 8000 miles away?  Do we have the stomach, desire or money to do such a thing?

I doubt it.

We watch China because we think they may get back into bed with Russia and there is already news suggesting China is going to play a part in Syria to keep Assad in power...and Russia is going to lead an END OF DAYS coalition against Israel.

Also we watch China because many watchers believe they are part of the KINGS OF THE EAST that are mentioned in Revelation.

Blood Soaked Muslim Ritual

Many of you have probably heard the saying that things will only change when Muslims love life more than they worship death.

While that might be a good start....I don't think it's going to happen in our lifetimes.

Check out these photos of Shi'ite Muslim men celebrating Ahsura.  They hit themselves with knives in the head and back in hopes of getting the blood to flow.  The more blood the better!!

The holy Day of Ashura festival sees millions of Muslim men and boys around the world take part in the dramatic ceremony.

It is held to mourn the death of the Prophet Mohammed's grandson, Imam Husayn, in 680 AD, during the Battle of Karbala.

The 10-day festival is observed by both Sunni and Shia sects, although self-harm is discouraged by some Shia leaders who say it creates a negative image of Islam. 

Shocking images from this year's ritual show streets in Iraq soaked with blood and youngsters posing with knives, spears and chains. 

The worshippers’ white robes are splattered with blood and many have open wounds on the tops of their heads. 

Those not carrying out the brutal acts slap their chests, chant, and act in street plays.

It is also common to combine the rituals with a pilgrimage to the Mashhad al-Husyn in Iraq, which is thought to be the resting place of the Prophet’s grandson.

Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Bahrain and Pakistan mark the day of Ashura as a public holiday, although it was banned under Saddam Hussein's rule. 

Here;  http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/614355/Blood-soaked-Islamic-ritual-scalps-cut-machetes?utm_source=traffic.outbrain&utm_medium=traffic.outbrain&utm_term=traffic.outbrain&utm_content=traffic.outbrain&utm_campaign=traffic.outbrain

I'm just not convinced these folks are ready to come into the civilized world and be politicians, bakers, truck drivers and teachers in The West.

You and I both know it's part of a Satanic blood lust that draws these people to carry out such nonsense.

"But Dennis, you have a Christmas tree every year!...and that's a pagan practice.  So whats the difference?"

When you get questions like that from non-believers, sometimes it's just better to sigh and move on.

Matthew 7:6
“Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.

"We Go to 22 Weeks" of Age to Kill Babies

Another undercover video was just released as hidden cameras record abortion providers discussing killing and selling baby parts.

You really need to take a few minutes and watch this latest video as one abortion provided from Texas tells how she kills babies at 22 weeks of age to harvest the best parts.

Bioethicist Dr. Dennis Sullivan laid out key observations about the latest undercover Planned Parenthood video, taking aim at what he called “callousness and indifference” and explaining why he’s left with the “unavoidable conclusion” that some fetuses might be “born alive.”

The key question surrounding the 11th video that was released this week by the Center for Medical Progress, a pro-life group, surrounds whether Dr. Amna Dermish, the subject who was secretly recorded, is actually admitting to performing illegal partial-birth abortions.

Dermish is seen in the video seemingly describing how she sometimes turns a baby beech — a position in which the fetus emerges feet-first rather than head-first — during abortion procedures.

“I can if I need to. I generally don’t have to do that. I don’t usually do it in the 16 to 18 weeks,” she seemingly said after being asked if she can convert to that position during abortions. “With a further gestation I will sometimes do that if it’s a cephalic presentation [head-first], just because it’s easier to get.”

The problem with the 11th video from the Center for Medical Progress, according to Sullivan, is that the dialogue presented seems to show that doctors want to provide researchers with intact calvariums, or brains.

To do this, he said they would not be able to use the aforementioned method, as it would destroy the tissue that they are looking to procure.

“So how do they insure that the fetus dies before delivery? In the video, Dr. Dermish clearly states that she does not use digitalis to stop the heart unless the fetus is 20 weeks or older,” Sullivan said. “So I’m left with the unavoidable conclusion that some of these fetuses are born alive, then killed after birth. If true, this is a clear violation of federal law.”

Watch video here;  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/10/29/bioethicist-reveals-the-unavoidable-conclusion-hes-left-with-after-analyzing-abortion-doctors-claims-in-latest-undercover-planned-parenthood-video/

Here is how CRAZY ILLOGICAL this whole thing is!!  If a woman went to hospital complaining of stomach pains only to go into delivery and push out a 22 week old baby, doctors would rush it to an incubator and have successfully saved those babies and sent them home with their mothers as healthy fully functioning kids!

BUT if the woman got up in the night and said to herself, "Crap! I didn't even know for sure if I was pregnant!  I'm not ready to be a mother!  I was hoping to go to prom this spring and then college in the fall!"...and then walks over to incubator, reaches in and twists baby's head off...SHE WOULD BE CHARGED WITH MURDER AND EVEN THE LIBERALS WOULD SCREAM "HOW COULD SHE DO SUCH A HEINOUS THING?!?!"

But yet that SAME BABY sitting 2 inches up in his mother's womb can legally be mashed to death and dragged out of the womb, carved up and sold for body parts.

It's so illogical there has to be a supernatural force deluding otherwise intelligent people.

Lord, have mercy.

LGBT Nuclear Bomb

It's not enough that the L and G of LGBT want to have legal rights to marry, they DEMAND so much more!

So the Supreme Court has established "same-sex marriage," and that will quiet the LGBT crowd, because, after all, they got what they wanted, right?

Not even close.

How about protections for LGBT people in jobs, jury duty, credit applications, housing, facilities that provide exhibitions, facilities that provide recreation, facilities that provide exercise, facilities that provide amusement and even facilities that provide "gatherings"?

Already, there's a bill in Congress to do all those things and much more.

It even would gut the 1993 federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act so LGBT-based discrimination complaints could be brought against churches that follow the Bible, which teaches homosexual behavior is a sin.

The "Equality Act" would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 "to include sex, sexual orientation and gender identity among the prohibited categories of discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation."

It would unilaterally change public school desegregation standards "to provide for the assignment of students without regard to sexual orientation or gender identity."

Churches that hold to biblical beliefs about sexuality would not be immune, according to Paul Kengor, whose book "Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage" addresses the problem.

He shows how, beginning with Karl Marx and continuing with Margaret Sanger, Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and assorted '60s radicals, formerly fringe concepts have been accepted. And they're being used by leftists to attack traditional marriage.

"I think we're already seeing what's next from the ‘LGBT' and same-sex-marriage movement – that is, an aggressive and uncompromising push for forced acceptance, forced compliance, and forced acquiescence," he said. "For these people, ‘tolerance' doesn't actually mean ‘tolerance,' just as ‘diversity' doesn't actually mean ‘diversity.' What they want is a very selective tolerance and very selective diversity, which, of course, isn't actually real tolerance or real diversity.

Kengor said they support what Marcuse called "repressive tolerance."

"They are going to coerce those who disagree with their movement and their agenda, and that will include an aggressive attempt to force religious believers into full compliance with their movement and their agenda," he said.

"For that, they will enlist the long arm of the state, and they will seek to do so with liberal politicians as their handmaidens. The force will take the form of fines, pickets, boycotts, demonization and, in some cases, incarceration," said Kengor.


Here;  http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/October27/273.html

Remember friends, Sodom and Gomorrah were loaded with sin...just as all nations and people are...BUT it seems that the final sin where God said "ENOUGH!" was blatant, out of control, unheeded, homosexual lust.

Genesis 19
4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”  6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing.

Wicked thing.....

The very next day, Lot left the city and it was destroyed by God Almighty.

And yes...He can do that.  It's His universe, His creation, His rules, His order.

As we have asked before...if God is never changing, WHY would he not do the same thing to America?

America's Achilles Heal Has Russia Searching

Russia is a player in the Last Days according the Bible...and she certainly has been making the news headlines as of late on a DAILY basis.

Today we read an article tells us Russian subs are snooping around the ocean looking for all the fiber-optic cables laying in the depths of the oceans...cables that, were they to cut, could cripple US Military communications, among other things.

America's Achilles Heel? Russian Submarines Probing Undersea Cables For Future Conflict 

There seems to be a renewed zeal in the current Russian administration to regain the position of power it once held during the cold war era. 

The military procedures it has undertaken in Crimea and now Syria have showcased to the world (and particularly to the United States) that their military and technical capabilities were being vastly underestimated. 

This highly charged environment has led to the United States being weary of what else Russia might have in store.

One of the major causes of worry that is starting to get some attention in the press is the increasing amount of Russian naval activity close to major underwater cables. 

These high-tech fiber-optic cables laid out along the sea floor are capable of moving almost unimaginable amounts of data at ever-increasing speeds.  They serve as the lifeline of our increasing digital economy. 

Close to 95% of the world’s communications travel through these underwater cables, including banking transactions, military data transmission, emergency response services, voice and data transfer and essential information for air and sea travel.

If you consider that undersea cables are the No. 1 tool used by U.S. authorities to communicate with troops and allies overseas, you understand why neutralizing this communication would be a prime objective of any foe in war time. 

One can only imagine the havoc that would ensue on our economic systems.  Wall Street needs constant updates to survive in our global digital economy.  Any disruption, even for a short time, could neutralize our economy. 

What is surprising is that the location of these cables is well known. There are many interactive maps online that plot out their routes.  The cable operators stick to areas of the ocean they are familiar with and that have been charted before to minimize their own risk. 

Many parts of the cables are also extremely easy to cut and have the potential to bring an entire economy to a virtual halt. 

Such breaks can happen due to natural disasters, anchors dragging along the sea floor by unknowing ships or due to unsavory elements. These breaks happen almost exclusively in the shallow waters a few miles off the coast and can be repaired within 3-5 days in most cases.

However, the Russian naval vessels seem to be scouting for the location of these vital cables at much deeper depths where finding the breaks could take much longer to repair if major damage occurred. 

Such an occurrence happened in 2007 when nearly 100 miles of underwater cable was stolen off the coast of South East Asia by pirates who wanted to sell it on the black market. The repair took nearly 3 months to complete.

The effects of such a cable breach have the potential to completely isolate a territory from outside communication; something that would be extremely beneficial in the case of armed conflict. 

Here;  http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/October28/281.html

"Geez Dennis, why do you have to post all these scary headlines?  Do you get some perverse joy from watching conflict break out all over the place?"

Ummmm....maybe?

4 Jesus answered: “Watch out that no one deceives you. 5 For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Messiah,’ and will deceive many. 6 You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. 7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of birth pains.

So you see, our Savior Jesus told us that we would hear about all sorts of nasty things going on as His return nears but goes on to tell us that we shouldn't be afraid because all these things MUST HAPPEN.

So we are excited for Jesus to return...so we live with more anticipation as the very things He told us to watch for come into focus.

Now remember, our BLESSED HOPE is that Jesus the Groom will come for his Bride BEFORE the wrath of God is poured out and BEFORE the Antichrist is even revealed!!

So yes, I actually do get some joy as I wonder if the trumpet could blow any day now....

16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. 18 Therefore encourage one another with these words.

Europe Now Scrambling for Guns

This news article is surely going to wrinkle the fabric on lots of liberals who love everything about Europe and wish, wish, wish that America could be more like her.

Austrians are arming themselves at record rates in an effort to defend their households against feared attacks from Muslim invaders.

Tens of thousands of Muslim “refugees” have poured into Austria from Hungary and Slovenia in recent months on their way to Germany and Sweden, two wealthy European countries that have laid out the welcome mat for migrants. More than a million will end up in Germany alone by the end of this year, according to estimates from the German government.

Obtaining a working firearm and ammunition in Germany, Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands is practically impossible for the average citizen. Germany, for instance, requires a psychological evaluation, the purchase of liability insurance and verifiable compliance with strict firearms storage and safety rules. And self-defense is not even a valid reason to purchase a gun in these countries.

The laws in Austria, while still strict, are a bit less overbearing.

A Czech TV report confirms that long guns – shotguns and rifles – have been flying off the shelves in Austria, and Austrians who haven’t already purchased a gun may not have a chance to get one for some time. They’re all sold out.

And those arming themselves are primarily women.

“If anyone wants to buy a long gun in Austria right now, too bad for them,” the Czech newscaster says. “All of them are currently sold out.”

He cites the Austrian news outlet Trioler Tageszeitung as the source of his report.

“We cannot complain about lack of demand,” Stephen Mayer, a gun merchant, told Trioler Tageszeitung.

He claims the stock has been sold out for the last three weeks and that demand is being fueled by fears generated by social changes.

“People want to protect themselves,” Mayer said. “Nonetheless, the most common purchasers of arms are primarily Austrian women.”

They are also buying pepper sprays, which Mayer said are in big demand among those who can’t get a gun.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/islamic-invasion-pulls-trigger-europeans-scramble-for-guns/#cHVGtM7V1PVvMTGe.99

The saying is true....when a bad man with a gun comes around, EVERYONE hopes to see a good man with a gun arrive.

Throuples Coming to America

Yes, we have blogged on this polygamy topic numerous times over the years, but it keeps showing up in more and more conversations.

It's like the liberals have a mental block when it comes to the definition of marriage.  They DEMAND that two men or two women have the RIGHT to be married in the eyes of the state and the nation....but when you ask them a very simple question, 'Why would you limit marriage to two people?  Why not three or four?"....their liberal minds go blank.

When you press them about how unfair it is that Bi-sexual people are currently forced to make a choice about only loving and marrying ONE PERSON, many liberals will say, "Yes!  They should be allowed to marry more than one person!"  And when you ask them how that would work for Social Security benefits, Health Insurance, children of that marriage, etc....their liberal minds go blank.

Also what confuses them is when you ask a liberal woman if a man should be legally allowed to have 2-3 or 4 wives in America.  If they say, "No!", say to them "Why?  It's legal in lots of other nations around the planet.  Who are YOU to limit how many women a man can love?  Don't you know that men were BORN WITH the capacity and desire to love more than one woman?"

Has the Supreme Court's ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry paved the way for all kinds of non-traditional relationships to be legally recognized?

"If marriage is not the union of a man and a woman, why limit it to two people?" asked Michael Brown, a national talk radio host and author of "Outlasting the Gay Revolution." "What makes the number two unique or necessary? Why not marry yourself, as some women have recently done? Why not throuples? There are several examples of this in the last few years. Why not three women and two men? We see this already in polygamous relationships. Why not?"

Three "gay" men in Canada are asking that very question.

The three 20-something medical professionals live together in Nova Scotia as a threesome, and they now hope to start a family.

According to the London Daily Mail, Adam Grant and Shayne Curran got married in 2011. A year later they met Sebastian Tran in a nightclub and both fell for him. Grant and Curran then got divorced so they could let Tran into the fold as part of an equal, three-way relationship.

Polyamory is not legal in Canada, but the men claim they have lawyers who can draft paperwork to ensure all three are "equally bound and obligated to each other in the eyes of the law."

Tran said getting married legally is important to his partners and him.

Paul Kengor, a university professor and author of "Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage," said these types of unions are inevitable once a nation redefines marriage to mean anything other than one man and one woman.

"Once the standard becomes that marriage can be defined in whichever way a people or culture desire, then marriage is redefinable, period," Kengor told WND. "This is plainly inevitable. If liberals could get past emotion, and look at the sheer logic of what they're asserting, then they'll see that they've created the conditions for these types of new marriage configurations by smashing the standard of one-man-one-woman marriage."

Carl Gallups, a pastor, talk radio host and author of the forthcoming book "Be Thou Prepared," believes the U.S. soon may see odd configurations for marriage such as threesomes.

"This is exactly where we can expect the U.S. to go in the near future," Gallups told WND. "Why would it not go in this direction? What is to stop it from doing so? There is no longer a ‘normality standard' for marriage or domestic relationships – including the definition of family. In fact, I predict that U.S. conjugal relationship scenarios will eventually become even more bizarre than this example."

For the "gay" Canadians, it does get more bizarre than a simple longing for marriage. Last week, the men told the Daily Mail they want to conceive three children using their own genetics. The plan is for Curran's two sisters to carry the children and Tran's sister to donate her eggs as well.

Brown, who writes a WND column, worries about any child that may be born into that kind of scenario.

"The worst thing of all is that a child could be brought into this relationship, robbed of his or her mother, subjected to a poor example of family structure, and living in a situation that has all the potential for real instability and guaranteed confusion," he said.

Kengor said leftists now have their work cut out for them to stop a slide down a slippery slope, if they want to limit "gay" marriage to monogamous relationships.

"Liberals will now need to explain to threesomes like these how and by what standard they can be denied their ‘marriage rights' and their ‘marriage equality,'" Kengor challenged. "Liberals need to explain to these three men and their would-be children why their love is not legitimate. Does ‘love win' here or not? If not, then why?"

Gallups pointed out there may be a larger social agenda behind what the Canadian lovers are doing. As the Daily Mail reported, "The trio hope to show that polyamory is a perfectly acceptable choice of life and love."

"Why should we be surprised by this?" Gallups asked rhetorically. "The radical gay agenda in the United States has admitted, long before the SCOTUS ruling, that nationwide gay marriage legalization was just the beginning of their greater plan. Their declared agenda has always been stated as a radical broadening of the definition of legalized domestic relationships as well as a direct targeting of the institutions they felt might be standing in their way, namely the Christian church, our nation's Christian heritage, and the standard biblical message."

Gallups noted the "standard biblical message" about marriage can be found in Matthew 19:4, straight from the lips of Jesus: "Have you not read, that in the beginning God made them male and female? For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife and the two will become one flesh."

"Jesus' declaration is irrefutable: The definition of a legitimate marriage (from the One who invented marriage) is one woman and one man – period," Gallups said.

But the pastor believes too many people ignore the Word of God and choose to do what is right in their own eyes.

"Knowing what I know about the nature of people who deny the Word of God as the authority of their life, and what I know about the declarations of the Word of God itself, they will do whatever they can dream up – and whatever they can get away with," Gallups warned. "Simply put, we have ‘been given over to a depraved mind,' just as the Bible predicted (Romans 1:18-32)."

Gallups believes it is essential for the Christian church to speak up for traditional marriage and traditional families.

"While today's church must always be ready to reach out with the gospel message and the love of Jesus Christ to all people who are struggling in any matter of sin, it must never relent from proclaiming the clear biblical truth of the eternally important matters of the very foundations of life and society: home, marriage and family," Gallups said.

"Without these truths as the bedrock foundations of our culture, we will plunge into absolute madness."

Here;  http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/October26/261.html

It's so simple friends.  GOD is THE ONE who ordained ONE WOMAN AND ONE MAN=MARRIAGE.

I have never found a single Bible reading/Bible believing person to believe that marriage is anything BUT one man and one woman.

The words of Jesus, who IS GOD;
4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’[a] 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’[b]? 6 So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”

Jesus NEVER said anything about a man being joined to a man and the two becoming one.  He also never said anything about the three, four, five or six of them leaving their mothers and fathers and all be united sexually and becoming one flesh.