Friday, March 30, 2018

Pope Francis Movie Coming Soon. Could He Be a Candidate for False Prophet?

We have said it since Francis came into power...if the rapture happens soon, this Pope would be a prime candidate for FALSE PROPHET.

Even some atheists I know sing his praises. "Now that's a Pope I can even like!"

Why?  Because he says things that atheists love to hear, like softening the biblical stance on men sodomizing other men...."Who am I to judge?", says Francis.

Now today we are reading that he may be changing the Catholic view about hell.

Updated | Catholic Pope Francis made a startling revelation Thursday by stating that hell did not exist, in an interview with a leading liberal Italian newspaper.

In an article titled “It Is an Honor to Be Called a Revolutionary," La Repubblica founder Eugenio Scalfari acknowledged the pontiff's previous remarks about how "good souls" who sought repentance from God would receive it and then asked, "What about the bad souls?" Seemingly going against centuries of core Christian belief, Pope Francis said the souls of sinners simply vanished after death and were not subject to an eternity of punishment.

Here;  http://www.newsweek.com/does-hell-exist-pope-francis-says-no-interview-could-change-catholic-church-866010

The Vatican is now doing its best to walk back what the Pope said by saying he never said it.

Call it fake news, or maybe just wishful thinking.

A Thursday story claiming that Pope Francis had denied the existence of hell spread like, well, hellfire. In an alleged interview for Italian journal La Repubblica, the pope told atheist journalist Eugenio Scalfari that bad souls “are not punished” and that “There is no hell, there is the disappearance of sinful souls.”

The story, which would have fundamentally changed the foundations of one of the oldest institution in the world, was picked up by The Drudge Report and a number of high-profile publications, including Newsweek. But the Vatican says the story was fabricated.  

The pope did meet with Scalfari, but he did not grant him an interview, said Vatican spokesperson Thomas Rosica. The Vatican called the article, “the fruit of his reconstruction,” and “No quotes of the aforementioned article should therefore be considered as a faithful transcription of the Holy Father’s words,” according to a statement received by the National Catholic Reporter.

Here;  http://www.newsweek.com/pope-francis-hell-vatican-easter-866927

Did he say it or didn't he say it?  You will have to decide for yourselves.  I'm going to bet he said it...but the Vatican is so freaked out that he said it that they had no choice but to claim he never said it.

As you know, the doctrine of sinners being destroyed and NOT going to hell is called ANNIHILATIONISM.

People love the idea of it because it means that even if they spent their whole life on earth raping and eating people, at their death they just cease to exist. 

Love it!!  No judgment!  No punishment!  No explanations! No bowing before the King!

And now you need to watch this movie trailer about the Pope that is coming out in May.

Here;  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOmY8i-uBcY&feature=youtu.be

The trailer has an ominous voice describing the Pope,  "No matter what divides us, his words unite us."

What????

That's funny, because Jesus said He came to bring a sword and that his words would divide families and friends.

Wow, wow, wow!

When asked last week about the clueless high school kids marching against guns, this Pope said, "I hope they keep marching."

We also know he invited a Muslim Imam to the Vatican last year and let him pray to his God, Allah as all the Catholics bowed their head.

We have to ask the question again;  Is Catholicism just a different branch of Christianity or is it SO FAR REMOVED FROM THE MAINSTREAM that it has become it's own FALSE RELIGION?

Jesus warned that there would be many people on judgment day that would say to Him, "But Lord, Lord!, didn't we prophecy in your name and didn't we cast out demons in your name?"  But Jesus will tell them to depart from him, because even though they had believed they knew Jesus, Jesus says he didn't know them.

"Wait a second!  You mean sitting in Mass on Christmas and Easter and sometimes after I got really drunk on Saturday didn't count for NOTHING?"

When I think about what group of people that is best known for casting out demons, even in all the Hollywood movies...who is always portrayed as the Exorcist?

Yep!!  It's the Catholics.


Thursday, March 29, 2018

Racist Blacks in South Africa?

Is it racist to ask the world to make a list of nations led by black people that are thriving, intelligent, innovative and people want to move there from oppressed nations to find a better life?

Nope.  That's just a question.

So how many nations can you think of?

How about South Africa?  White people built all the infrastructure and business which led to South Africa being the wealthiest nation in Africa, but ever since the 1990's the black people have been running it.

So how's that going for them?

Teaching Whites a Lesson’: Every Five Days a White Farmer Is Killed in South Africa by Blacks

South African farming activists are outraged at the lack of police action following a series of brutal attacks on white farmers.

Many in the farming community are disturbed by a newly introduced motion that rules land can be seized without any financial recompense. Critics believe that the proposal to amend Section 25 of the constitution has enabled disgruntled members of the community to invade and steal farmland without fear of legal consequences.

Civil rights organization AfriForum has alleged that there have been 109 recorded attacks so far in 2018 and 15 farm murders, which means that one white farmer has been killed every five days this year. “Our rural areas are trapped in a crime war. Although the South African government denies that a violence crisis is staring rural areas in the face, the numbers prove that excessive violence plague these areas,” said Ian Cameron, AfriForum’s Head of Safety, as reported by Newsweek.

A 35-year-old farmer, Gabriel Stols, told the Independent that his brother Kyle, 21, was shot dead by four people on a game reserve near Bloemfontein. “What is happening to us is torture, it is slaughter, it is brutal, it is revenge. The world doesn’t know what is happening in South Africa,” he said.

The policy was originally proposed by the leader of the far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), Julius Malema, who has insisted that it is the right of black South Africans to take back the land. In a speech delivered Wednesday, Malema said it was time for the white farmers to leave. “They must leave the keys of the tractors‚ because we want to work the land,” the controversial figure declared, as reported by Times Live. “They must leave the keys of the houses‚ because we want to stay in those houses.”

Mr Malema has previously described land seizures as “teaching whites a lesson.”

“We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land,” he said in response to the motion passing by 241 votes to 83.

His fiery response was, in part, as a response to remarks made by an Australian Home Affairs Minister, Peter Dutton, who has offered to explore options for issuing visas to stricken farmers.

Dutton said that the oppressed farmers deserve “special attention” and need help from a “civilized country” like Australia. “If you look at the footage and read the stories, you hear the accounts, it’s a horrific circumstance they face,” he said, as reported by the Sydney Herald. “We have the potential to help some of these people that are being persecuted.”

On Monday, Australia’s former Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, told 2GB Radio that there is “a very serious situation developing in South Africa,” as reported by the Guardian. “Something like 400 white farmers have been murdered – brutally murdered over the last 12 months,” he added.

Abbott continued: “Just imagine the reaction here in Australia if a comparable number of farmers had been brutally murdered by squatters intent on driving them off their land … we would say this is a national crisis.”

https://www.jewsnews.co.il/2018/03/25/teaching-whites-a-lesson-every-five-days-a-white-farmer-is-killed-in-south-africa-by-blacks.html

Also Cape Town has been suffering a major drought and might soon be the largest city in the world to ever run out of water.  It could happen as early as next month.

Oh yeah....they refused Israel's help in managing their water crisis.

And what do you suppose is going to happen to South Africa if the militant, ignorant blacks end up killing and driving away all the innovative whites who built successful businesses and farms which brought all the wealth and food to South Africa?

Yep!  It will collapse like a house of cards and fall into poverty and civil war.  You can almost see it as clearly as you can see this picture of militant blacks getting ready to take over South Africa.

Sweet Jesus Ice Cream Coming to America?

When the world starts using the name of Jesus to sell ice cream...it's pretty evident that the world has any FEAR OF THE LORD.

When they even go further and seem to mock Christ and his followers in an attempt to be clever and sell ice cream...it becomes evident that this company is oblivious about WHO they are offending.

And in the last photo ad they even take the Lord's name in vain by saying "God D..."

It would be my hope that followers of Christ in America would not visit these ice cream shops when they show up in your neighborhood.

Sweet-Jesus-Girl

Sweet-Jesus-Ice-Cream-ad-boy-600

Sweet_Jesus_ice_cream_ad-commandment

WASHINGTON – Sundaes will never be the same, say Christian activists troubled by the invasion of the U.S. market by a Canadian ice-cream chain called “Sweet Jesus” that seems hell-bent on a marketing plan centered around soft-serve blasphemy.

The Toronto-based company founded by Andrew Richmond and Amin Todai in 2015 now has 19 locations in Canada, and one at the Baltimore-Washington International Airport. It has plans to open in other U.S. locations, such as Mall of America.

One ad on the company’s website shows a Nativity Scene, but instead of Baby Jesus, there’s an ice-cream cone. Many of their ads are replete with cherished Christian and Catholic symbols that are used to mock faith, including a rosary beads, a crucifix with a corpus, and angels.

And there’ something just downright creepy about the Mad Magazine-style imagery of children in the company’s ads. Some of the children have bruises and appear to be abused. Some say the ads sexualize children and have accused the company of pandering to pedophiles.

There are also Satanic symbols interspersed throughout the ads, such as upside-down crosses, lightning bolts, skulls, roaring wildcats, and images that suggest vampires and blood.

“The entire marketing concept of their company is to mock the name of the Lord Jesus Christ,” wrote Elizabeth Johnston about the company on her blog Activist Mommy.

http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/blasphemous-ice-cream-chain-coming-to-u-s/

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Major War Brewing With Russia?

We know that Russia is going to be a big player in the very Last Days.

So it shouldn't surprise us that they are taking center stage as we watch all the signs transpire that Jesus told us to watch for.

It also shouldn't surprise us that all the headline surrounding Russia involve WARS AND RUMORS OF WAR.

Global Anti-Russia Campaign Is Taking Us Dangerously Close To Disaster

The expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats from the US, along with dozens of others from various other countries, should be a sobering moment for all of mankind. It’s a sign of how close to the brink of a major war the world is coming.

To start with, this current episode is not comparable to the 55 Soviets expelled by Ronald Reagan in 1986 or the 50 or so thrown out by George W. Bush in 2001. Those actions were directly related to spying activities – which all governments engage in, directed against their friends as well as enemies. The Russians do it, the Americans do it, everybody does it. There’s nothing remarkable about cutting the numbers down now and then, particularly after a major embarrassment like the 2001 Robert Hanssen scandal.

But these latest expulsions have nothing to do with how many of the Russians might be actual spies. Nor with the nonsensical accusations of Russian election interference to “sow discord” and “discredit democracy.”

In fact, they have almost nothing to do with the US State Department’s unsupported claim that “Russia used a military-grade nerve agent to attempt to murder a British citizen and his daughter in Salisbury.”  The absence of evidence that the Russians were behind the attack is no more relevant than repeated, equally evidence-free accusations of chemical weapons use by the Syrian government. Whatever happened to the Skripals and whoever is behind it, Salisbury is a mere pretext.

No, the real purpose is much simpler. Decrying the American action, Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov stated that he had told his US interlocutors that “the United States took a very bad step by cutting what very little still remains in terms of Russian-American relations.”

But severing the last vestiges of that relationship is what the expulsions are designed to do. Disrupting US-Russia ties isn’t a means to an end – it is the end.

For several years, many commentators and analysts have pondered whether the US and Russia are already in a new Cold War, and if so when things will get better. The crystal-ball gazing can now stop. The answers are all too clear.

Yes, we are in a new Cold War and have been for some time. Indeed, it is foolish to think that on the US side the first Cold War ever really stopped. As long as we had a puppet government in Moscow under Boris Yeltsin in the 1990s, we could do as we pleased. Plunder Russia’s resources with the assistance of corrupt oligarchs installed by Western “experts.” Expand NATO to the east after promising we wouldn’t. Bomb Serbia. Invade Iraq. Expand NATO some more. Stage regime change operations in the name of “democracy.” Declare that Ukraine and Georgia will be members of NATO.

As for the second question – no, things will not get better. Perhaps never.

What about President Donald J. Trump, the man who is supposed to be the Leader of the (anachronistically named) Free World? Hasn’t he repeatedly said he wants better relations with Russia?

The answer is supplied by the former State Department spokesman under the Obama administration, Admiral John Kirby, who said the expulsions were “… embraced by our European allies because they’ve been worried that with some of the things they’ve heard or haven't heard from this president about Russian President Vladimir Putin means he might be soft on Moscow. But this tells them that the national security professionals they’ve been talking to behind closed doors really have held sway and the US policy is following what they have always promised, which is to crack down.”

Perhaps Kirby overstates how much some of our European satellites really want more confrontation with Moscow, but he’s absolutely right about the role of the “national security professionals” operating “behind closed doors.” Make no mistake, of all of Trump’s 2016 heresies against the bipartisan establishment, none was of more concern than what seems to be his sincere wish for a new détente with Moscow.

Those behind this global campaign think we can treat Russia as though it were a minor power of the magnitude of Serbia, Iraq, Libya, or Syria, or even Iran. They think if we just keep pushing, pushing, pushing, either the Russians will collapse or back down. They can see no other acceptable outcome than removing Putin and returning Russia to the condition of a Yeltsin-era vassal state – a term Putin used in his interview with Oliver Stone – or, better yet, its territorial breakup along the lines suggested by the late Zbigniew Brzezinski.


Things are going to get worse. Maybe a lot worse.  

Here:  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-27/global-anti-russia-campaign-taking-us-dangerously-close-disaster

I have written about a "Black swan" event in previous posts.  A "black swan" event is something that literally comes out of the blue and no one saw it coming.  Like 9/11.  We all sat with out mouths agape and said, "Wow!  Who knew that angry Muslims were capable of such things?"

Just imagine what would happen if we woke up tomorrow and read that Russia decided to retaliate against "Western aggression" by taking over some islands off the coast of Alaska?  Maybe the only thing on the islands are a few Eskimo hunters and a hunting shack.  That would be a "black swan" event that would instantly send the financial markets tumbling.

And then how would the FEDERAL RESERVE act to stop us from falling into recession?

They might have to slash interest rates to keep the borrowing machine operating.  And where do they go when interest rates are already at or near 0%?

They have no choice but to go NEGATIVE INTEREST. (NIRP)

And then this would lead to a further war on cash as people flood to banks to pull out their money and the FED has to come up with ways to punish those who try.

Can you now see how $100 bills may be declared as NOT LEGAL TENDER to make it hard for people to hold/horde cash?

Can you now see how the FED may follow through with the suggestion to put magnetic strips in all $20 bills so that they can even charge you negative interest when you HOLD cash?

Can you now see how it's very possible that the world is on the edge of a CASHLESS SOCIETY exactly as the Bible said it would in the very Last Days?

Pretty darn exciting time to be alive!  Just imagine if WE are the generation that never sees death but goes right from this flesh costume and exchanges it for glory in the twinkling of an eye!! 

What a day that would be!!

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Distracted Drivers Killing Thousands

One would hope that the angry students protesting guns and gun violence and claiming that the gun was responsible for students deaths in school shootings all over the country....would next turn their ire on those dangerous cell phones that are killing and maiming thousands of Americans every year.

Smartphones Are Killing Americans, But Nobody’s Counting

Jennifer Smith doesn’t like the term “accident.” It implies too much chance and too little culpability.

A “crash” killed her mother in 2008, she insists, when her car was broadsided by another vehicle while on her way to pick up cat food. The other driver, a 20-year-old college student, ran a red light while talking on his mobile phone, a distraction that he immediately admitted and cited as the catalyst of the fatal event. 

“He was remorseful,” Smith, now 43, said. “He never changed his story.”

Yet in federal records, the death isn’t attributed to distraction or mobile-phone use. It’s just another line item on the grim annual toll taken by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration [NHTSA]—one of 37,262 that year. Three months later, Smith quit her job as a realtor and formed Stopdistractions.org, a nonprofit lobbying and support group. Her intent was to make the tragic loss of her mother an anomaly.

To that end, she has been wildly unsuccessful. Nine years later, the problem of death-by-distraction has gotten much worse.

Over the past two years, after decades of declining deaths on the road, U.S. traffic fatalities surged by 14.4 percent. In 2016 alone, more than 100 people died every day in or near vehicles in America, the first time the country has passed that grim toll in a decade. Regulators, meanwhile, still have no good idea why crash-related deaths are spiking: People are driving longer distances but not tremendously so; total miles were up just 2.2 percent last year. Collectively, we seemed to be speeding and drinking a little more, but not much more than usual. Together, experts say these upticks don’t explain the surge in road deaths.

There are however three big clues, and they don’t rest along the highway. One, as you may have guessed, is the substantial increase in smartphone use by U.S. drivers as they drive. From 2014 to 2016, the share of Americans who owned an iPhone, Android phone, or something comparable rose from 75 percent to 81 percent.

The second is the changing way in which Americans use their phones while they drive. These days, we’re pretty much done talking. Texting, Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram are the order of the day—all activities that require far more attention than simply holding a gadget to your ear or responding to a disembodied voice. By 2015, almost 70 percent of Americans were using their phones to share photos and follow news events via social media. In just two additional years, that figure has jumped to 80 percent.

Finally, the increase in fatalities has been largely among bicyclists, motorcyclists, and pedestrians—all of whom are easier to miss from the driver’s seat than, say, a 4,000-pound SUV—especially if you’re glancing up from your phone rather than concentrating on the road. Last year, 5,987 pedestrians were killed by cars in the U.S., almost 1,100 more than in 2014—that’s a 22 percent increase in just two years.  

Safety regulators and law enforcement officials certainly understand the danger of taking—or making—a phone call while operating a piece of heavy machinery. They still, however, have no idea just how dangerous it is, because the data just isn’t easily obtained. And as mobile phone traffic continues to shift away from simple voice calls and texts to encrypted social networks, officials increasingly have less of a clue than ever before. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-17/smartphones-are-killing-americans-but-nobody-s-counting

I can't wait until a see a student holding a sign that says MY RIGHT TO LIFE TRUMPS YOUR RIGHT TO A CELL PHONE as they all board buses to march in D.C. and send the politicians and lobbyists from Apple and Samsung and message to DO SOMETHING!!!

What a day that will be when these phone addicted students demand change to current cell phone laws!

Maybe they should demand that no Americans can purchase cell phones until age 21 since it is proven how dangerous they can be in the hands of young users?

As Expected, Students Protesting Guns Are Clueless and Angry

As you read these articles, your first response is to laugh at how ignorant and smug these folks are. 

But soon you realize that these angry leftists are cloning themselves at colleges and public high schools all over the country.

They don't realize that Hitler, Stalin and Mao first took the guns of their citizens before they killed millions.

In fact, these kids don't even know who Stalin is...and most of them think communism would be a good thing for America.

So who do you think PUT THESE IGNORANT KIDS onto the buses and let them out of school to travel to D.C. to protest?  Who do you think paid for it?  Who do you think organized it?  Who do you think is giving their lunatic ideas life by broadcasting updates on the news everyday?

On Saturday, people across the country took to the streets to protest gun rights in connection with the organized March Against Our Lives demonstration in Washington, D.C.

Reporter Austin Fletcher, known as Fleccas, hit up downtown Los Angeles to see what these "common sense" solutions to blunt gun violence were all about. Of course, most of the protesters threw out lovely platitudes but had no real solutions, were deeply confused about current gun policy, and scoffed at the idea that a good guy with a gun could stop a criminal with a gun.

"The NRA is a terrorist organization," said one protester who rocked a black "F*** Trump" t-shirt. He added that the gun rights organization with over 5 million members is on par with the Islamic State.

Some of the protesters who didn't outright tell the truth about the desire to confiscate guns assured the public that this march was not about taking away guns or abolishing the Second Amendment. They did this right before they cited Australia, a country whose government had a mandatory gun buyback. So...

And the logic about violence was airtight.

"It's okay when we kill each other when you're trying to fight for your country, or your land, or fr---, but when it comes to me shooting you, it's a crime?" said one female protester.

What if a man with a gun broke into your home, asked Fleccas. "wouldn't you be at a disadvantage" without a gun?

"Indeed," replied one woman, "but that's just the bad luck of my life."

If you die, you die.

Other protesters stated their desire for the U.S. to ban fully automatic weapons, which are already banned, and were confused about the difference between automatic and semi-automatic weapons.

"The public doesn't need machine guns; they don't need automatic weapons," said one man.

When he was told this was already a reality, the protester responded, "Assault weapons, dude." He then swiftly left to go "march."

That was actually a common theme in the video. When, Fleccas would counter their lofty arguments with facts, these extreme protesters were suddenly in a hurry to get out of there. Weird.

And what about protecting our schools with an armed, trained security guard, just as we protect our airports and banks? This was apparently an appalling suggestion.

"F*** no," said one protester to the idea.

This is "not a priority," answered another woman.

"Our schools aren't prisons," was another refrain.

One protester contested, "It doesn't actually make us safer to have armed security officers."

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28660/watch-march-our-lives-protesters-are-clueless-amanda-prestigiacomo

And then make sure to go this link below and watch an actual video from the march where a reporter asks some protesters some very basic questions about the guns they hope to ban.

Here are some of the best answers:

“Yeah, it’s um, assault weapon. It’s like, um — I kind of do, but kind of don’t.”

“No, I guess. But assault weapons, like, does that sound safe to you?”

“A phrase that comes to mind is like, military style weapon.”

“Yeah, it’s an arm that, like a gun for instance, that you can buy at a shop pretty easily that is, like — can cause more deaths than, like, one, I guess.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/28647/watch-when-marchforourlives-protesters-are-asked-frank-camp

It's tragic to ponder but how many of these protesters do you suppose have surrendered their lives to Jesus Christ?

Just a few?  None?

So how many do you suppose have actually bought into evolution as THE answer to how everything came into existence?  How many do you suppose have no problem with a woman allowing a doctor to reach into her uterus and murder a baby?  How many do you suppose wake up in the morning and give thanks to the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus for their life and breath?  How many of them do you suppose believe what the Bible confirms about marriage being between one man and one woman til death separates them?  How many of those teens do you suppose have already given their minds over to daily viewing of porn and hallucinogenic drugs?

Take heart folks!  Please remember that God is still on the throne and he laughs at those folks who shake their fist at him.

Psalm 2
1 Why do the nations rage
    and the peoples plot in vain?
2 The kings of the earth rise up
    and the rulers band together
    against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
3 “Let us break their chains
    and throw off their shackles.”

4 The One enthroned in heaven laughs;
    the Lord scoffs at them.
5 He rebukes them in his anger
    and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
6 “I have installed my king
    on Zion, my holy mountain.”  (Hey!  That's Jesus that the Psalmist is talking about!)

Praise the Lord!  Jesus IS coming!

Monday, March 26, 2018

Army of Islam Proposed by Turkey Sure Sounds Like Ezekiel 38 Coalition

Ezekiel 38 tells us that Turkey will be a player in the Last Days coalition that desires to destroy Israel and take their wealth.

Russia, Iran and some other North African Muslim nations are also named players.

When we read this article about Turkey proposing a Muslim army to destroy Israel...it should make us sit up take notice.  Also see that Somalia and Sudan are mentioned...which is North Africa.

Mercy!! This sure seems like a major prophetic event to me!!

TURKEY’S President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) have announced they want to create an “army of Islam” to wage war against Israel, it has been revealed.

Less than a month ago the Turkish state’s mouthpiece the daily Yeni Şafak ran an article for Erdogan titled “A call for urgent action” and on the newspaper’s website headlined “What if an army of Islam formed against Israel?”

It called for the 57 member states of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to form a joint army to simultaneously attack Israel from all sides.

The article said: “If the member states of the OIC unite militarily, they will form the world’s largest and most comprehensive army.

“The number of active soldiers would be at least 5,206,100, while the defence budget would reach approximately $175billion (£124billion).”

This was accompanied by an interactive map providing formation of military forces for a joint Muslim attack on Israel.

The article provided additional details of the plan, saying: “It is expected that 250,000 soldiers will participate in the first of a possible operation.

“Land, air and naval bases of member states located in the most critical regions will be used.

“Joint bases will be constructed in a short period of time… It is possible for 500 tanks and armoured vehicles, 100 planes and 500 attack helicopters and 50 ships to mobilise quickly.”

Erdogan did not deny his support for the report and has on several occasions said he would like to resurrect the Ottoman Empire.

The tyrant has established military bases in Qatar and Somalia and recently reached an agreement with Sudan to acquire a Sudanese island in the Red Sea to be used as a military base.

Here;  https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/936954/World-War-3-Turkey-Erdogan-army-of-Islam-Israel-war-attack-all-sides-latest-news

We can't know for sure this is the Ezekiel 38 coalition forming, but it would sure seem that WWIII is being prepared when you see the headline of this article.

World War 3: Turkey's Erdogan calls for 'ARMY of Islam' to ATTACK Israel on all sides


We Just Added Another $1 Trillion of Debt

If you and your wife had combined income of $100,000, how many years do you suppose you could spend more that you make and put $10,000 on your credit card while never paying down the principal?

If the interest rate on your credit card was 18% the payments could really start digging into your cash flow pretty significantly and would be painful after a few years.

And if the interest were 3% you might feel that you could continue to rack up credit debt for a few more years.

But ultimately, when your credit card debt got to $100,000 you might look at each other and say, "What have we done?!  We can't live like this any longer and in fact unless we can raise money by selling assets, we might lose everything!"  And this point I would hope they would realize that they have a serious lifestyle problem and commit themselves to change their habits.

It didn’t take long for the U.S. to rack up another trillion dollars of debt

It has taken a little more than six months for the U.S. national debt to grow by a trillion dollars, a quick clip that has little precedent over the nation’s recent history.

Last week, the debt hit $21 trillion for the first time, rising from the $20 trillion mark it notched on Sept. 8. The debt is guaranteed to go higher, with President Donald Trump having signed a debt-limit suspension in February, allowing unlimited borrowing through March 1, 2019. Economists expect wider deficits to result from the tax cut Trump signed in December.

While a trillion-dollar increase over roughly six months isn’t unprecedented — there was one in 2009, during the Great Recession, and another in 2010 — it’s certainly fast.

The national debt exceeded $20 trillion in September 2017, after taking 20 months to add a trillion dollars. A debt limit that had been in place since March 2015 was raised in March 2017, and again on Sept. 8, 2017.

Farther back, however, such trillion-dollar increases took longer: 43 months, for instance, near the end of Bill Clinton’s first term.

The first time the nation’s debt hit $1 trillion was in October 1981, during Ronald Reagan’s first term.

Looking ahead, analysts see the nation much deeper in debt. The Committee for a Responsible Budget projects trillion-dollar deficits returning permanently by next year, and debt exceeding the size of the economy within a decade.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/it-didnt-take-long-for-the-us-to-rack-up-another-trillion-dollars-of-debt-2018-03-20

Because of numerous circumstances that smell a lot like a Ponzi scheme, America currently only has to pay about 3% on it's $21 trillion of debt...BUT....when the world refuses to carry that debt at 3% and raises it to 5% or 7% or even 10% to reflect our credit risk....what do you think might happen?

Do you see any politicians trying to get elected by telling us that bankruptcy, struggle and hardship are staring us in the face unless we do something drastic and painful...and do it quick?

Nope.

The only politicians that people are willing to elect would be the ones who tell us what we want to hear.

"Don't worry friends!  America is great and always will be!  We are going to provide free health care, free food, free apartments and free nursing homes to everyone AND we are going to increase our military budget so we can continue to defend the world against tyranny AND we are going to spend $1 trillion on improving our infrastructure!  And if that isn't enough, WE ARE GOING TO CUT YOUR TAXES TODAY SO YOU WON'T HAVE TO PAY FOR ANY OF IT!!"

"Yea!!!", said all the sheeple....seeming to not have a care that none of it really makes any sense.