Friday, January 13, 2023

Minnesota Democrats Throw Out Protection of Babies Born Alive

So let’s say you are a doctor aborting a 9 month old baby.  You are having a tough time killing it and while you turn around to get a bigger scissors the baby is suddenly pushed out and laying on the table.  Can you continue trying to kill the baby?  Back in 2015 the legislature in Minnesota said “no”.  But today the Democrats are going to get rid of that protection.  They don’t want politicians looking over doctors shoulders.  They want the killing of babies to stay in darkened rooms behind closed doors.  Satan must love this.  

***************************

Minnesota Democrats have introduced a bill that would repeal several of the state’s “restrictions” on abortion, including a statute that protects infants who survive abortions.

The “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” was passed by the Minnesota Legislature in 2015. It states that abortion survivors should be fully recognized as human persons and provided with medical care to preserve their lives.

Rep. Tina Liebling, DFL-Rochester, wants to repeal these protections because they are an “insult” to doctors, she said during a House Health Committee meetingThursday.

Her bill would also repeal restrictions on the use of public funds for abortion and a requirement that aborted babies be “disposed” of in a “dignified and sanitary” manner.

Rep. Anne Neu Brindley, R-North Branch, attempted to preserve the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, but her amendment to Liebling’s bill was rejected.

“It is very clearly a person who is alive. It is absolutely shocking to me that we are having this discussion. It was not enough to support the most radical abortion policyin the world. Now we are saying that even if a baby is born alive, that that child also should not live, that that child also has no rights,” Neu Brindley said.

“This repealer literally allows infanticide,” she added. “It is abhorrent that we are sitting here right now having this conversation … I cannot believe the lack of humanity that is on the table today.”

Liebling responded by condemning Neu Brindley’s “personal, inflammatory, politically-motivated rhetoric.”

“This law that we are repealing in this bill is first of all based on a lie about how abortion works. This is not what happens in abortion, but it is built around this insulting idea that medical professionals are unethical and they need politicians … standing over their shoulder in the room where they’re treating their patient to make sure that they behave appropriately,” Liebling said.

“To say that there are no protections in Minnesota law for infants who are alive is absolutely untrue and inflammatory,” she continued. “What if we had a law that said legislators must not beat their spouses?”

According to the Minnesota Department of Health, there were five infants who survived abortions in 2021.

Neu Brindley’s amendment to preserve protections for born-alive infants was rejected in an 8-11 vote by the DFL-controlled committee.

Democrats have also rejected bans on partial-birth abortions and late-term abortions this legislative session. They are moving a bill through the Minnesota Legislature that would guarantee a woman’s “fundamental right” to abort her baby for any reason up to the moment of birth.

 https://alphanews.org/minnesota-democrats-want-to-repeal-protections-for-infants-who-survive-abortions/

Thursday, January 12, 2023

Could it Really Be the End of America? For Real This Time?

 The Bible tells us that the end of societies come when God "gives them over" to their own evil desires.  Their minds become reprobate.  Even their women become perverted.  Men are inflamed with lust for other men.  Men dress as women and women dress like men.  And if you dare ask any questions you will be called names.

For the last 250 years of America's existence there has always been someone saying, "Yeah, this whole country can't stay together too much longer!"  Think of the Civil War.  Think of the Viet Nam war and the civil rights protests.  Think of the Woodstock generation and the shootings on Kent State by the National Guard.  Think of WWII when all the women rushed to the factories to make bullets and tanks!  And yet America stayed on.

Of course the difference now is that the collective country has been given a reprobate mind.  The game changer is the mass perversion that we are all experiencing.  Also the lawlessness that is breaking out in cities across America.  A great storm used to bring neighbors together.  Now it's simply an excuse for folks to go kick out all the windows and loot every store in their own city.

Can America persevere?  We believe the ONLY reason we haven't collapsed already is because God himself is holding things together until He decides to tell his Son, "Go and get your bride."

I've posted the entire article from Front Page Magazine Below

Is the West Living in the End of Days?

An apocalyptic vibe seems to have settled over the West. Signs and portents abound: The Covid plague and the Russo-Ukrainian War have unleashed two of the Four Horses of Revelations. For those not terminally “woke,” gaudy transexuals performing for prepubescent school-children, and credentialed medical doctors poisoning and mutilating healthy children and young people bespeak the moral idiocy that typically marks civilizational collapse. A self-created energy crisis threatens to turn off the heat and lights and all the other amenities of modern civilization. And cities rife with murder, daylight plundering of stores with impunity, junkies shooting up near schools, excrement polluting the sidewalks, and the mentally disturbed roaming streets and subways summon up images redolent of rough beasts whose time has come round at last.

What we’re really talking about is that staple of historiographical pessimism, what in 1918 Oswald Spengler called the Decline of the West. Since then many moments of Western decline have come and gone. But is this time different? Are we finally facing the end of the most sophisticated, wealthy, and powerful civilization in history?

Our geopolitical rivals certainly think so. Putin’s Russia, Xi’s China, and Khamenei’s Iran watch our cultural degradation, hedonistic lives, intolerance for physical and psychic discomfort, obsession with even low risk, and dwindling faith, and calculate that we no longer have the nerve or convictions to maintain our global dominance, and can be pushed aside for new, autocratic Axis Powers that will be the global hegemons.

To this geopolitical triumvirate, the Western “new world order” postwar paradigm comprising democracy, rule by law, free-market economies, political accountability, human rights, equality of the sexes and sexual preferences, confessional tolerance, and the separation of church and state is played out. Now other, more autocratic traditions marginalized by the arrogant West will be better stewards of the global community.

And why shouldn’t they think we are declining, when for decades many of our own cultural, intellectual, and political elites and institutions have turned against those defining goods?

They have banished faith from the public square; redefined marriage, sexuality, and the two sexes themselves; polluted our schools and universities with illiberal doctrines and intellectual higher nonsense; opened our southern border to millions of unvetted illegal aliens and tons of lethal drugs; assaulted and defaced, literally and figuratively, our history, monuments, and national heroes; denigrated patriotism and embraced a utopian globalism; and replaced our national and civilizational sagas with narratives of racism, sexism, xenophobia, oppression, conquest, and other collective sins for which we should feel nothing but guilt and shame.

Why, then, wouldn’t our rivals take our cognitive elites at their word and strive to dismantle and replace this toxic civilization that for more than half a millennium has tyrannized the world, befouled the earth, and plundered its resources? Haven’t our own environmentalists for decades been preaching prophecies of climate doom brought on by Western technology, consumerism, and capitalism that have ravaged the natural world and brutalized its peoples? Aren’t our green catastrophists now demanding that the West pay multiple billions in reparations to those victims in the developing world? Haven’t our wealth, leisure, comfort, and security come at their expense?

This new axis of enemies can see that we have already been doing their work for them. We have become propagandists against our own civilization, fifth-columnists undermining our institutions of learning with self-loathing curricula devoid of basic skills; our militaries with self-hating racist dogma and transsexual pseudo-science; and our economy with cronyism, rent-seeking, and unsustainable debt.

Worst of all, the United States––the alpha power that for 77 years has defended the West, brought down its nuclear-armed rival, and led our allies in developing new transformative technologies, and widely distributing wealth––now has infected Europe with our lunatic cultural fads, and endangered its economies by driving the world’s largest economy to bankruptcy with our metastasizing debt and trillions of dollar in unfunded liabilities.

Worse, many of us are relentlessly dismantling and trying to replace with a technocratic despotism the Constitution that for more than two centuries has allowed us enough stability, freedom, and protection from tyranny to make this power and wealth possible.

Such catalogues of decline typically are accompanied by explanations of why. As far back as ancient Athens, the corruption of the citizenry’s character by wealth and leisure has explained the erosion of civic virtue like courage, service, and duty that brings on decline and defeat.

For example, in the direct democracy of ancient Athens, citizens could vote to spend public money on themselves through state subsidies and stipends. According to the historian Theopompus, this redistribution of money made 4th century B.C. Athenians “less courageous and more lax.” Rather than spending money on the military to check the ambitions of Phillip II, “the Athenian people thoroughly squandered their state revenues. . . . The young men dallied over prostitutes in the little flute-girl establishments, men slightly older than they over drinking, dice and similar debauchery, and the entire citizenry spent more on public festivals and sacrifices than on the management of the war” with Phillip. The sorry end came in 338 B.C. at the battle of Chaeronea, where Phillip’s victory ended Athenian political freedom and autonomy.

Over the centuries this dynamic has been blamed for a state’s decline. Wealth and leisure, along with the power of the citizens to redistribute money to themselves, become a toxic brew that weakens character. It also fosters short-term, selfish thinking that prefers enjoying today’s pleasures to preparing for tomorrow’s dangers––a bad habit endemic to democracies.  Free citizens who vote in regularly scheduled elections that hold politicians accountable, encourage such thinking.

That’s why our crisis of unfunded liabilities in the big-three entitlement programs, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, has been neglected even as year-by-year bankruptcy moves closer and closer. And why our military budgets lack the resources and attention needed to check the aggression of our global rivals.

And don’t think China, Iran, and Russia haven’t noticed. Their economic and autocratic dysfunctions in the long-term may likely be unsustainable, but that doesn’t mean that for now these powers aren’t dangerous. Moreover, our various cultural and fiscal problems, which for decades millions of free citizens have indirectly chosen and continue to support, are part of the autocrats’ arguments against liberal democracy and political freedom, and for an even more powerful and controlling government that sacrifices unalienable rights for greater efficiency––a tempting bargain, as our own progressives and many corporations demonstrate with their admiration for China.

Another standard cause of civilizational decline is the abandonment of religion, and a mentality “that would like to see God eradicated once and for all from the public life of humanity and shut up in the subjective sphere of cultural residues from the past,” as the late Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI put it.

But without a transcendent authority to buttress our virtues, principles, and rights given not by other flawed men, but by “nature and nature’s God,” as our Declaration of Independence put it, our defining principles, morals, and laws are cast adrift. Especially in an open and free society, every ideal, good, virtue, or principle becomes negotiable and relativistic, mere subjective preferences and tastes for which most people are not likely to fight, kill, and die.

The central importance of religion is the argument of Russia and Iran, who contrast their regimes–– founded, whether sincerely or cynically, on faith and religious observance––with the Christophobic West. The perceived heathenism of America and Europe has been a constant theme both in jihadist exhortations, and in Vladimir Putin’s sermons and rationalizations for his brutal invasion of Ukraine.

Again, these assertions may be pretexts perfuming more earthly or venal motive. But the point is not whether they are true, but whether they are effective at marshalling support and strengthening morale for the aggression. Meanwhile, the West’s circulation of sordid images and preposterous cultural fads like transsexualism only make our rivals’ claims about our lack of faith and moral corruption more plausible.

All this doesn’t mean decline is inevitable. Our Constitutional order may have its weaknesses that give scope to the frailties and selfishness of human nature, but its enumerated, unalienable rights and its guarantee of political freedom and equality have not, despite the near-century of effort by progressive technocrats, been cast aside. At least not yet.

If we are living in the end of days, and if decline will be our destiny, it will be we free American people who make that choice.

Here;  Is the West Living in the End of Days? | Frontpage Mag


Russia Apparently Shot Down a UFO

 The world continues to have the words UFO and UAP pushed in front of their faces on headlines and social media.  Unidentified Flying Object and Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon.  Both of those words get folks thinking about "intelligent aliens who are visiting earth from far away planets or galaxies."

Today we have this headline.

Russia Apparently Shot Down a UFO

News organizations all over the world are repeating a strange report out of Russia this week: that they were able to shoot down a UFO. The incident occurred in the Rostov region, which is an area of great strategic significance in the ongoing struggle between Russia and Ukraine. According to government officials, the object was detected at about one and half miles of altitude, and was “liquidated.”

But what exactly was this thing? Was it really a UFO, or was it some kind of drone?

The object was described as a “small ball” or sphere. Orb UFOs have long been a an established type of encounter. In recent years, much like reports of UFOs of every other type, the prevalence of these orb encounters have increased dramatically. Skeptic say that these glowing balls in the sky are not unidentified objects at all and that people simply don’t know that what they are seeing are flares, aircrafts, or even drones.

The Russian region has definitely been subject to several drone attacks, as well as the usual surveillance missions. One wonders if this story of a UFO is not the Russian media’s way of warning would-be attackers of their sturdy anti-aircraft defenses, or just covering up information of what it really was that fell out of the sky.

Whatever the odd sphere was, it is destined to remain unidentified—at least, outside of Russian military operations.

Here;   Russia Apparently Shot Down a UFO (msn.com)

Of course all of this chatter about aliens and their ships is preparing the ground for Satan to explain to the world WHERE ALL THE CHRISTIANS WENT following the rapture.  The Antichrist may very well explain to the world that, "The Christians were all taken by our space brothers, the Grays, to be reprogrammed.  They simply refused to enter into reality with the rest of us as they CLUNG to that old ancient book called the Bible!  They are all safe and well cared for and will be rejoining us in the not distant future...as soon as their minds are open."

And of course the Left Behind world will totally believe it!  Yes, those Christians DID refuse to believe in vaccinations, masks, global warming, climate change, gay marriage, abortion, transgenderism, pronoun use and all sorts of other things!  They simply refused to WAKE UP to the times!  Hopefully our alien brothers will finally make them go WOKE!

Wednesday, January 11, 2023

Net Zero Emissions Will Lead to the End of Civilization

I’m convinced that our fellow citizens on the Left are driving the bus into the ditch.  It’s very concerning to the world if America fails because there will be no other place on planet earth where freedom loving people can flee to.  China, Iran and Russia will not be sending food, aid and medical supplies.  The light of freedom will vanish.  The delusional Left have convinced themselves that the top issues on earth are LGBTQ rights, (wrong), man-made climate change, (wrong), racism by colonial white people, (wrong) and forcing everyone to believe as they do.  Remember all the Leftists who wanted to jail anyone who refused the vax?  Check out the article below and draw the conclusions about HOW fossil fuels fueled the growth of civilization.  The Left is convinced that energy is bad if it causes any pollution.  They think the world can live off of windmills, rainbows and unicorn meat.  If you disagree they also believe you should be silenced.

************************

In a recently published science paper, Dr. Wallace Manheimer said it would be the end of modern civilisation. Writing about wind and solar power he argued it would be especially tragic “when not only will this new infrastructure fail, but will cost trillions, trash large portions of the environment, and be entirely unnecessary”. The stakes, he added, “are enormous”.

Dr. Manheimer holds a physics PhD from MIT and has had a 50-year career in nuclear research, including work at the Plasma Physics Division at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. He has published over 150 science papers. In his view, there is “certainly no scientific basis” for expecting a climate crisis from too much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in the next century or so. He argues that there is no reason why civilisation cannot advance using both fossil fuel power and nuclear power, gradually shifting to more nuclear power.

There is of course a growing body of opinion that points out that the Emperor has no clothes when it comes to all the fashionable green technologies. Electric cars, wind and solar power, hydrogen, battery storage, heat pumps – all have massive disadvantages, and are incapable of replacing existing systems without devastating consequences.

Manheimer points out that before fossil fuel became widely used, energy was provided by people and animals. Because so little energy was produced, “civilisation was a thin veneer atop a vast mountain of human squalor and misery, a veneer maintained by such institutions as slavery, colonialism and tyranny”.

This argument hints at why so many rich, virtue-signalling celebrities argue not just for Net Zero but ‘Real’ Zero, with the banning of all fossil fuel use. King Charles said in 2009 that the age of consumerism and convenience was over, although the multi-mansion owning monarch presumably doesn’t think such desperate restrictions apply to himself. Manheimer notes that fossil fuel has extended the benefits of civilisation to billions, but its job is not yet complete. “To spread the benefits of modern civilisation to the entire human family would require much more energy, as well as newer sources,” he adds.

The author notes that the emphasis on a false climate crisis is becoming a “tragedy for modern civilisation”, which depends on reliable, affordable and environmentally viable energy. “The windmills, solar panels and backup batteries have none of these qualities,” he states. This falsehood has been pushed by what has been termed a climate industrial complex, comprising some scientists, most media, industrialists and legislators. Furthermore, he continues, this grouping has “somehow” managed to convince many that CO2 in the atmosphere, a gas necessary for life on Earth, one which we exhale with every breath, is an environmental poison.

In Manheimer’s view, the partnership among self-interested businesses, grandstanding politicians and alarmist campaigners, “truly is an unholy alliance”. The climate industrial complex does not promote discussion on how to overcome this challenge in a way that will be best for everyone. “We should not be surprised or impressed that those who stand to make a profit are among the loudest calling for politicians to act,” he added.

Perhaps one of the best voices to cast doubt on an approaching climate crisis, suggests the author, is Professor Emeritus Richard Lindzen of MIT, one of the world’s leading authorities on geological fluid motions:

What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that CO2 from human industry was a dangerous planet-destroying toxin. It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world – that CO2, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.

Much of Dr. Manheimer’s interesting paper debunks many of the fashionable nostrums surrounding politicised ‘settled’ climate science. It is an excellent read. Discussing some of the contrary opinions that debunk obviously false claims, he says it is “particularly disheartening” to see learned societies make definitive claims when so much contrary information is readily available. He points out that over the last 10,000 years, the Earth has almost certainly been warmer. There have been warmer and colder periods, just like today.

To find the off-narrative information, even Google can be used, Manheimer says – though he does note that the company warns it will not provide information on “claims denying that long-term trends show that the global climate is warming”.


https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/net-zero-will-lead-end-modern-civilisation-says-top-scientist

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

All's Not Rosy in Israel as "Civil War" Phrase Gets Tossed Out

 If you haven't figured it out already, it's not just America that is coming apart at the seams.  The world seems to be coming apart at the seams.  Many people are very, very divided.  Here in America the divide is between the "woke" Left who believe that men can have babies and that wolves and cats can actually be trapped inside human bodies, vs. those on the Right don't buy into any of their delusional thinking.

But these divides are happening all over the world.  Even in Israel there a lot of angry Jews who maybe aren't going to coexist much longer.

Remember, Benjamin Netanyahu just got re elected as Prime Minister after 5 elections were unable to put together a coalition government.  So power is very tenuous there.  Lots and lots of disagreements on how Israel should be moving forward.

National Unity party chairman and former Defense Minister Benny Gantz excoriated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accusing him of leading Israel towards civil war.

Speaking at a faction meeting of the National Unity party Monday afternoon, Gantz lambasted the new right-wing government’s planned judicial reforms, which were proposed last week by newly minted Justice Minister Yariv Levin (Likud).

Gantz accused the Likud of moving forward with the reforms – long pushed by the Right to curtail the ability of the Supreme Court to overturn Knesset laws – in order to shield Netanyahu from prosecution in his ongoing corruption trials.

“If you think that we won’t give you a fair trial, don’t try to correct it by doing an injustice to the State of Israel and Israeli society,” Gantz said, calling the proposed judicial reforms “anti-patriotic and anti-Zionist.”

“If you continue down the path you are now taking, you will bear the responsibility for the eventual civil war in Israeli society,” he said.

“I am telling you this as clearly as possible: You have chosen audacity, but we will choose to fight you in a just struggle…

“The plan you are pushing and enabling will cause catastrophic harm to national security, as well as to the personal sense of security of every citizen in every sector of the population….

“Without a strong, independent judiciary, Israel will be weak against our enemies and the effort to delegitimize us.”

Opposition leader and former prime minister Yair Lapid also denounced the planned reforms Monday, which sparked demonstrations drawing thousands of left-wing protesters in Tel Aviv over the weekend, vowing to continue the “war over our home.”

“At this point we’re not even arguing with the government about politics. We are fighting for the continued existence of Israel, and for the basic idea of being able to live together, which this evil government mercilessly wants to crush,” he said.

Here;  Gantz threatens civil war, tells Netanyahu 'we will choose to fight you' | World Israel News

This division in Israel is going to increase Israeli desires for a strong leader.  We believe this will further pave the way for them to accept the Antichrist when he shows up.

We honestly don't know how much longer the world can stay together without a massive eruption of wars, famines, lawlessness, financial collapse and disease.  There are some prophecy writers who look at it all and conclude that "we are on the very cusp of the rapture."

We sure hope so.

Large Numbers of “Christians” Don’t Believe that Jesus is the Only Way

 This shouldn’t surprise us because Jesus said there would be a great falling away in the very Last Days. Most Bible teachers believe he was referencing a time when people who claim to be followers of Christ actually reject the clear teachings of the Bible.  “No man comes to the Father except through me”, is deemed too harsh and unrealistic so they invent another, different Jesus.  One more to their liking.  And in that process they create a false idol and break even more of God’s laws.

********************************

While Walrond's openness as a Christian to the idea that there are many paths to God beyond Christianity may have been shocking to some, new research shows a widespread departure among Christians from traditional Bible teaching such as Jesus being the only way to God. And some scholars have blamed this ideological shift in part on influential divinity schools and charismatic church leaders.

Rejecting God of the Bible

In 2008, a Pew Research Center Study found that more than half of all American Christians believe that at least some non-Christian faiths can lead to salvation. Nearly a decade later, a new study has shown that even among the most traditional Christian groups, significant minorities are also rejecting God as described in the Bible.

While 80 percent of all Americans surveyed in the new study, also conducted by the Pew Research Center, said they believe in God, only 56 percent say the God they believe in is the one "as described in the Bible."

The strongest supporters of God as described in the Bible were Christians who self-identified as members of historically black Protestant churches at 92 percent, followed closely by evangelicals at 91 percent.

Significant minorities of Christians who identified as Catholics, 28 percent, and mainline Protestants, 26 percent, indicated that they believe in a higher power or spiritual force which is not God as described in the Bible.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/why-jesus-is-no-longer-only-way-for-many-american-christians.html

Monday, January 9, 2023

An Interview With a Trans-Wolf

 If you claim to be tolerant of all people and all beliefs, then you must accept that everyone’s truth is equally valid and must be accepted.  As we have pointed out numerous times, the funny thing about the folks who claim to be the most tolerant, is that they are totally intolerant of Bible believing Christians.

Also, if you can be a trans gender or trans sexual then it makes perfect sense that some people are also trans species.  They are wolves, rabbits and horses trapped in human bodies.  Check out the video below where Matt Walsch interviews a wolf trapped in a human body.

I hate to point out the obvious, but for those who believe America is going to return to normal, it’s high time you take the red pill and see the truth of where we are and where we are going.

https://youtu.be/NOt4jsV59uw