Trump Has a UFO Speech Written

 We posted on this before but it's in the news again so will make another.

With Spielberg's movie coming out on Disclosure and also with the documentary that came out 4-5 months ago called AGE OF DISCLOSURE, the governments of the world are having a harder time denying that something NOT OF THIS WORLD has been interacting with humans for a very long time.

How would the world change if Trump steps to the podium this summer and says, "Fellow Americans, our government has been involved in a deep coverup of non-human entities and not-of-this-world technology and I'm ordering an instant release of the entire coverup program.  Yes, we do have alien bodies on ice and yes, we do have their ships in our hangars."

President Trump has just issued a statement via his social media feed that he will order the release of any and all files related to UFOs and aliens...

"Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

And cue the crazy...

Documentary filmmaker Dan Farah appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast in November to promote his new documentary, The Age of Disclosure, and predicted that his film might force Trump to become the first world leader to confirm the existence of extraterrestrial life publicly.

"I wouldn't be surprised if it happens soon after the film comes out — the sitting president has to step to the microphone and say: humanity is not alone in the universe,” Farah told Rogan. “We have recovered technology of non-human origin. So have other nations. There is a high-stakes, secret cold war race to reverse engineer this technology. We need to win this race.” 

“I think Trump might be the only guy that’s willing to do something that crazy,” Rogan replied.

Well, now Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, let it slip during an appearance on the New York Post's Pod Force One podcast that Trump has a speech prepared confirming extraterrestrial life exists.

“Do you think that he's about to make an announcement about UFOs?" host Miranda Devine asked.

“Because President Obama was just on a podcast talking about how he believes in UFOs and hinting that he saw something when he was president.”

“Well, I said this in my podcast, too,” Lara Trump began.

“What's funny is we've kind of asked my father-in-law about this, 'cause we're like, ‘Well, what do you know?’ ‘Cause, Miranda, we all wanna know about the UFOs, or we all wanna know what's going on and he played a little coy with us. And so that, of course, led us to believe, Eric and I, were like, ‘Oh, my gosh, if he won't even, like, fully tell us, maybe there's more to it.’ And then I have just heard kind of around that... I think he's actually said it, I think my father-in-law has actually said it, that there is some speech that he has that, I guess, at, at the right time, and I don't know when the right time is, he's gonna break out and, and talk about, and it has to do with maybe some sort of extraterrestrial life, so to speak.”

Here;  Trump Orders Release Of All Files Related To UFOs & Aliens | ZeroHedge

For my new readers, these are NOT aliens that evolved on planets far away billions of years ago.  They are the same deceptive demons and fallen angels that have been deceiving mankind since Satan dressed up like a snake in the garden.

The fact that most people will believe these demons will fulfill what Paul wrote about concerning the Last Days when he says "people will believe in doctrines of demons."

We are certainly living in the Age of Deception.  Stay very close to your Bible and Jesus because only He came to bring truth, so that that truth will set you free from deception.

Woke Church Using Rainbow Glitter Instead of Ashes for Ash Wednesday

 It's certainly coming true when Jesus says, "Will I find any faith at all when I return?"  Of course it's a rhetorical question because the answer is going to be "very little" will be left in the churches of the world.  Sadly, even in America.  Our churches have now become "we will tell you how great your are if you come to our Sunday service!"  Where is the repentance?  Where is the sin?  Where is the hell that Jesus spoke much about?  Where is the blood of Christ?  Where is the wrath of God?

It's been exchanged for gay glitter on Ash Wednesday.

I think of Jesus saying, "Depart from me!  I don't know you!"

Ash Wednesday is meant to be a solemn day of reflection, humility, and penitence--a ritual that has been observed for centuries as the gateway to Lent. It is a sacred moment in the Christian calendar, marked by ashes applied in the sign of the cross with the words: "Remember that you are dust, and to dust you shall return." 

The ashes are not decoration. They are not political statements. They are a call to repentance, a reminder of human mortality, and a summons to turn toward God. Yet an Atlanta-based progressive church, The Church at Ponce and Highland, has decided to upend all of that with what can only be described as sacrilegious glitter ashes.

The church's website proudly announces that congregants attending its Ash Wednesday service will have a choice between traditional ashes and ashes mixed with purple glitter. The stated purpose of these glittery ashes? To show "remorse at straight Christian cruelty to our LGBTQ siblings" and affirm LGBTQ identity. In other words, this church has hijacked a deeply spiritual ritual, repurposing it as a platform for ideological affirmation rather than repentance before God. Glitter, of all things, is now the vehicle for moral instruction. It is hard to imagine a more blatant distortion of a centuries-old tradition.

Ash Wednesday has always been about confronting our own sin and acknowledging our dependence on God. It is a moment that calls the faithful to self-examination, humility, and recognition of human frailty. The ritual is stark, austere, and sobering--designed to unsettle the ego, not dazzle it. Glitter ashes, by contrast, celebrate identity and affirm personal pride, supplanting repentance with performative virtue signaling. The symbolism is inverted: the ashes no longer mark the soul's need for redemption but the congregation's alignment with a social agenda.

This is not a one-off misstep but part of a broader pattern of activist politics infiltrating church rituals. The Church at Ponce and Highland openly rejects traditional frameworks, stating that "Christianity has gotten off track" and promoting a faith centered on doubt, inclusivity, and rejection of eternal punishment. It emphasizes "Jesus's love" over the salvific significance of his death and frames historic Christianity as an oppressive institution responsible for colonialism, slavery, and violence. Within this worldview, Lent becomes less about turning toward God and more about signaling ideological virtue to the world. Ash Wednesday, in short, is no longer an invitation to repentance; it is a platform for social apology.

The glitter ashes initiative is a glaring example of how certain progressive churches reinterpret centuries-old practices through the lens of contemporary culture wars. It is not just a distortion of Ash Wednesday--it is a rejection of the theological foundations that give the ritual meaning. 

By offering glitter ashes alongside traditional ashes, the church presents two competing visions of Christianity: one grounded in repentance and redemption, the other in affirmation of human identity and a secular moral framework. Only one of these is faithful to the historic observance. The other is a performative spectacle masquerading as spirituality.

It is also worth noting that this is not an isolated incident. In recent years, various progressive churches across the country have experimented with "inclusive" rituals, substituting traditional observances with ideologically driven versions. Some have rewritten liturgies to align with political causes, or offered communion in non-traditional forms meant to symbolize social justice rather than Christ's sacrifice. The glitter ashes phenomenon is the logical extreme of that trend: the hollowing out of faith in favor of social signaling.

The worldview underpinning these changes is unmistakable. Moral authority is no longer derived from God or Scripture but from contemporary cultural movements and the approval of marginalized groups. Rituals are evaluated not by their spiritual truth but by their ability to demonstrate ideological alignment. In this context, Ash Wednesday becomes a canvas for progressive virtue, rather than a somber call to repentance. The result is both the trivialization of a sacred ritual and a dangerous redefinition of Christianity itself.

Churches have always served as a moral compass, guiding believers toward humility, confession, and transformation. But when rituals are repurposed to advance secular agendas, the compass spins wildly, and the faithful are left confused about what, exactly, they are celebrating. Glitter ashes are not a symbol of remorse for sin; they are a symbol of a worldview that elevates identity politics over divine truth. They mock centuries of Christian devotion and replace the soul's reckoning with performative sparkle.

Ash Wednesday deserves better than glitter. Christianity deserves better than a church that rebrands penitence as political apology. True repentance is about acknowledging God's standards, confronting personal sin, and seeking reconciliation with Him. Glitter ashes are a distraction, a spectacle, and a sacrilege. They should be condemned--not celebrated--as yet another example of activist ideology corrupting sacred tradition.

Here;  https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=9568

You Must Watch the Chinese Humanoid Robots

You have to take a minute and watch these Chinese robots performing an intricate martial arts show with human children!  They can dance, flip, roll and jump just like humans.  Now just imagine an army of these bots, armed with night vision, a high powered gun and no fear.  Imagine drones coming in the sky by the millions while bot soldiers advance on the ground.  How can they be stopped?  Who will be here to stop them?

 Watch it here;  https://youtu.be/R6T-Ea5CfRE?si=UKXXPPCmUG5YVFPq

Could You Go to Jail One Day for Transphobia?

 It seems simple enough.  Maybe you were debating with a friend on social media and said, "Women and men can't simply change their DNA with a surgery and hormones!"  Then someone reads it and forwards it around and soon you have the police knocking on your door saying they have a complaint about your transphobic comments.

That's exactly what is starting to happen.  Maybe not in America YET....but when the Democrats get back in power you can bet they will do everything they can to make it happen here.

It sounds like something torn from the pages of dystopian fiction: a courtroom, a judge, and a citizen facing years behind bars--not for violence, not for fraud, not for theft, but for stating a belief about biology. Yet this is not fiction. This is happening now to Isadora Borges in Brazil, and if the world shrugs, the precedent could echo across continents like a thunderclap warning too many ignored.

Borges, a 34-year-old veterinary student, stands accused of "transphobia" for social media posts written years ago stating that transgender women are biologically male and that DNA cannot be altered by surgery or hormones. Those statements sparked a complaint from politician Erika Hilton, which in turn triggered a federal criminal case. Prosecutors are pursuing two counts, each carrying potential prison time. Combined, she could lose up to a decade of her life for words typed on a keyboard.

Pause and consider the gravity of that. Ten years. For speech. For opinion. For belief.

According to ADF International, even the judge has acknowledged the posts appear to reflect personal opinion rather than discriminatory intent. Yet the machinery of prosecution grinds forward anyway, fueled by a legal doctrine born when the Supreme Federal Tribunal ruled in 2019 that homophobia and transphobia should be treated as racism under existing law. With that single judicial stroke, categories of speech became potential crimes--without legislators ever voting to create such statutes.

This is how freedom erodes in the modern age: not with tanks in the streets, but with rulings in courtrooms.

The world only started paying attention after Elon Musk amplified discussion of the case online. That fact alone should trouble anyone who believes moral clarity should not depend on algorithmic virality. Why did it take a billionaire's repost for millions to notice that a woman could be imprisoned for stating a view shared by countless religious believers? Where is the roar of protest from churches, seminaries, and Christian leaders who have long warned that freedom of conscience is fragile?

Silence, in moments like this, is not neutrality. It is surrender.

This is not an isolated tremor. Pastor Douglas Baptista previously faced criminal charges for publishing a book explaining a traditional Christian understanding of sexuality. Those charges were dropped--but the warning shot had already been fired. The message was unmistakable: certain beliefs, if spoken aloud, may draw the attention of prosecutors.

Columnist Mary Anastasia O'Grady of the Wall Street Journal argues that cases like this reveal a judiciary accumulating extraordinary power--effectively shaping law, enforcing it, and judging it. Whether one agrees fully or not, the trajectory is impossible to ignore. When courts become arbiters of acceptable opinion, the boundary between justice and ideology begins to dissolve.

Supporters of such prosecutions often insist they are protecting dignity and preventing harm. But history teaches a sobering truth: once governments claim authority to criminalize viewpoints, they rarely stop with one category. Today it may be gender doctrine. Tomorrow it could be political dissent. Next year it might be religious orthodoxy itself. The principle is what matters. If the state can jail someone for holding the "wrong" belief, no belief is truly safe.

The danger is not disagreement. Free societies thrive on disagreement. The danger is enforced agreement.

Here;  https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=9562

Remember a few years ago in California when the nation was trying to decide if gay marriage was going to become the law of the land?  One CEO in California had donated money to a group that was fighting for traditional marriage to stay the same...one man and one woman.

When years later some hackers hacked into the database of donors they published that had given money to the cause.  He lost his job.  So it's already here.  What will change is the scope and topics that will get you in trouble.

One day, when the world turns on Christianity even more, you could be fined or jailed when they discover that you gave money to your local church if that church happens to preach that "Jesus is the ONLY way to salvation."